Mindaralew Zewdie
Department of Philosophy, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia
Abstract
This research is intended to introduce to
the global readership the saliencies that outline and define the Ethiopian
version of skepticism. This pioneering onus comes with the task of critically
reviewing the place skepticism holds and the notch it represents in the history
of philosophy. Thus the objective of this research is one of bringing to the
day light the Ethiopian variety of skepticism within the overall context of
philosophical repertoire. To pull this goal off, this research is designed
right from get go to make use of the rational and critical methods of
philosophical probing supported by key informant interview and focus group
discussion. Following a rigorous application of logical methods of
philosophical undertakings on the issue under scouring, this research comes out
with the conclusion that holds: The Ethiopian version of skepticism, touted neut-yinkaw (may wisdom cast its spell
on it) is a healthy and natural move to suspend judgment so that and until we
will be spared from scuttling our way right into hasty generalization. Neut-yinkaw is a social skepticism that
stands firm its ground in being an out and out anathema to prejudice, bias,
partiality, gullibility, half-baked judgments and injustice.
Keywords: Neut Yinkaw, social skepticism, shmagllae, half-baked-judgments, absolute skepticism
Author Biographies
Mindaralew Zewdie, Department of Philosophy, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia